Technology and Human Dignity

Question: Does majority rule government help advance present day science and innovation more than overbearing and severe systems? Under what government framework do science and innovation advance the most rapidly and completely? Answer: Vote based system plays a significant job in the progression of innovation and science. A just government framework is perhaps the best helper for people working more enthusiastically towards a more promising time to come, so as to exceed expectations in parts of science and innovation, in contrast to the severe and oppressive systems, where individuals do not have the motivation to make mechanical and logical advances. Karl Marx accepted that majority rules system and science, has achieved a movement from need towards opportunity upgrading the ways of life, when contrasted with a non-popularity based society, which implement limitations in common freedoms in this manner restricting mechanical change (Berlin, 2013). A vote based country probably won't be a propelling country, since a mess of choices is at demeanor of the chosen government authorities, who may not really be fruitful in putting resources into powerful undertakings which guarantee a superior future. As indicated by Nicholas Mele (2014), the poise of an individual has been sabotaged regardless of the drawn out life guaranteed progresses in clinical science, since it enables the individuals to control life. Science and freedom don't have similar objectives, science expects to anticipate and control the future, and despite what might be expected, freedom points on the benefits of the residents of a country. References Berlin, I. (2013).Karl Marx. Princeton University Press. Mele, N. (2014). Innovation and Human Dignity. https://www.ipjc.org/diary/AMOSSpring14.pdf. Recovered 22 July 2016, from https://www.ipjc.org/diary/AMOSSpring14.pdf